Research and analysis

Research and development in forensic science: review

Professor Bernard Silverman's review of research and development in forensic science.

From:
Forensic Science Regulator
Published
30 June 2011

Documents

Research and development in forensic science: a review

PDF, 79 KB, 24 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alternativeformats@homeoffice.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Review of research and development in forensic science: university responses

PDF, 636 KB, 193 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alternativeformats@homeoffice.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Review of research and development in forensic science: other responses

PDF, 885 KB, 157 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alternativeformats@homeoffice.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

In January 2011, Professor Bernard Silverman, Home Office Chief Scientific Adviser, was commissioned by Home Office ministers to conduct a review of research and development in forensic science.

This review includes information on the range of research and development carried out by forensic science providers, universities, and laboratories. It also makes recommendations to policy makers and others in the forensic science community.

The review was informed by consultation, with over 80 respondents, including over 40 universities.

Published 30 June 2011